The Open Championship
Royal Birkdale Golf Club · July 16–19, 2026
Our third major of the season. Royal Birkdale is not yet profiled in our database, so the model ran with equal component weights — the picks are based on overall skill estimates and consensus blend, not course-specific fit. The U.S. Open champion leads the board, and three players clear the Best Bet threshold at a major.
Royal Birkdale
One of golf's great links courses on England's northwest coast. Deep pot bunkers, firm fairways, coastal wind, and greens that demand local knowledge. Hosted The Open in 2017 (Spieth won) and returns for 2026. Royal Birkdale is not yet profiled in our database — SG component data is unavailable for the 2017 and 2008 Opens. The model ran with equal component weights (25% each). The picks are based on overall skill estimates and consensus blend.
Editor's Note (July 17)
This preview was originally published with Royal Portrush as the venue. The 2026 Open Championship is at Royal Birkdale, Southport, England. The venue text has been corrected. The model's picks were unaffected — the simulation used the correct course identifier throughout, and ran with equal component weights as Birkdale's SG component data is unavailable. All player edges and rankings are unchanged.
Season Context
Two Major Champions From the Value List
Rai won the PGA at $281 · Clark won the U.S. Open at $60
Four outright winners this season — Snedeker $351, Rai $281, Sterne $501, Clark $60. Fourteen events with T10 hits out of fifteen reviewed. Last week Kim Si Woo's T9 at the Scottish Open kept the streak alive. Now Royal Birkdale.
The Setup — No Course Profile This Week
Royal Birkdale is not yet profiled in our database — the model ran with equal component weights (25% each). The picks are based on overall skill estimates and consensus blend, not course-specific fit. It's still a links test — firm fairways, pot bunkers and coastal wind — but this week's edges come from player quality and market pricing, not venue modelling. The U.S. Open champion tops the board on skill alone.
Best Bet #1 — Wyndham Clark
Clark, Wyndham — $29
🔥 Best Bet (1.0u) · Our win%: 5.5% · Edge: +2.1pp · T10 edge: +3.1pp
The U.S. Open champion and the model's highest-conviction player all season. Clark won Shinnecock Hills, finished T5 at the Travelers, and posted T13 with +7.9 SG at the Scottish Open last week. His balanced elite profile (+0.58 APP, +0.49 PUTT, +0.22 OTT) travels to any layout — no course-fit help needed. At $29 the market respects him, but 5.5% vs 3.4% market implied is still genuine edge. A top-5 finish at a second major would cement his season.
Best Bet #2 — Jackson Suber
Suber, Jackson — $281
🔥 Best Bet (1.0u) · Our win%: 2.1% · Edge: +1.7pp · T10 edge: +6.9pp
The season's value pick MVP — two top-5 finishes (4th Byron Nelson, T4 Canadian Open) at prices from $156 to $326. Missed the Scottish Open last week (DNS) but is confirmed in the Open Championship field. At $281 in a major, the T10 each-way market is the primary play — 10.3% T10 probability vs market ~3.4%. High variance (2.79 std) creates the upside that pays at these prices.
Best Bet #3 — Si Woo Kim
Kim, Si Woo — $41
🔥 Best Bet (1.0u) · Our win%: 4.0% · Edge: +1.6pp · T10 edge: +4.5pp
T9 at the Scottish Open last week with +9.9 SG — links form confirmed. Kim's well-rounded game translates to any layout, and at $41 the market is underpricing a player ranked #6 in this field (+1.28 AdjSG). The links warm-up at the Renaissance Club produced a strong result heading into the year's final major.
The Value Board — The Full 15
With no course profile in play, the board is driven by overall skill and price. Rai — our PGA Championship winner at $281 — sits as a ✅ Value at $61. Kitayama and Cole are win-market plays, not top-10 plays: their T10 edges are -0.4pp and -0.1pp — the market prices their top-10 chances tighter than the model likes, but the win edges at $81 are real. Hatton brings T7 at the US Open and elite approach play.
Head-to-Head Matchup Value
Kim over Thomas — +35% EV, the top matchup edge on the card. Our model: Kim 62.9%, offered 2.14 (46.7% implied). EV = 0.629 × 2.14 − 1 = +35%. Rai over Morikawa — +30% EV. Our model: Rai 55.2%, offered 2.35 (42.6% implied). EV = 0.552 × 2.35 − 1 = +30%. Clark over Aberg — +20% EV. Our model: Clark 55.9%, offered 2.15 (46.5% implied). EV = 0.559 × 2.15 − 1 = +20%.
First Round Leader
Scheffler leads FRL probability at 5.5% (fair $18.2) — AM wave, 09:14. Clark 3.6% (fair $27.4) — PM, 14:25. McIlroy 3.5% (fair $28.5) — AM, 10:09. Kim 3.1% (fair $32.4) — PM, 14:36. Rai 2.7% (fair $37.1) — AM, 10:09.
Make / Miss Cut Fades
Tosti (72.4% miss, fair $3.63 vs book $3.15) — FADE. Kizzire (71.8% miss, fair $3.55 vs book $2.50) — FADE. Conners (67.2% miss, fair $3.05 vs book $1.95) — FADE.
Where We Could Be Wrong
We have no course sample at all — Royal Birkdale is not yet profiled in our database, so the model ran with equal component weights — and local knowledge matters here more than most venues. 17 players carry consensus signal that significantly exceeds our model and have been adjusted toward the consensus view: Shane Lowry (4.9x divergence — the 2019 Open champion), Xander Schauffele (3.9x), Justin Thomas (3.8x), and Tommy Fleetwood (2.8x) are the headline names. At a links major we lean toward consensus on the big-name adjustments rather than fighting the market. Scheffler is the market favourite at an implied 10.5% — our simulations have him at 7.3%, so we hold no position at that price. McIlroy is the fade: the market has him at an implied 9.1%, our simulations say 5.8%.
Value Picks
| Player | Our Win% | Market $ | Edge | T10 Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clark, Wyndham | 5.5% | 29.00 | +2.10pp | +3.10pp |
| Suber, Jackson | 2.1% | 281.00 | +1.70pp | +6.90pp |
| Kim, Si Woo | 4.0% | 41.00 | +1.60pp | +4.50pp |
| Rai, Aaron | 2.6% | 61.00 | +1.00pp | +2.60pp |
| Hatton, Tyrrell | 3.8% | 34.00 | +0.90pp | +5.20pp |
| Knapp, Jake | 1.5% | 151.00 | +0.80pp | +2.30pp |
| Smalley, Alex | 1.7% | 116.00 | +0.80pp | +2.30pp |
| Reitan, Kristoffer | 1.4% | 166.00 | +0.80pp | +3.20pp |
| Kitayama, Kurt | 1.8% | 81.00 | +0.60pp | -0.40pp |
| Gotterup, Chris | 1.0% | 251.00 | +0.60pp | +3.50pp |
| Mitchell, Keith | 1.0% | 201.00 | +0.50pp | +0.50pp |
| Cole, Eric | 1.7% | 81.00 | +0.50pp | -0.10pp |
| Canter, Laurie | 0.8% | 301.00 | +0.50pp | +4.10pp |
| Spieth, Jordan | 1.4% | 101.00 | +0.40pp | +2.90pp |
| Meissner, Mac | 0.7% | 301.00 | +0.40pp | +4.20pp |
Methodology: Monte Carlo simulation of the field over 10,000 trials, weighting strokes-gained skill estimates, course-fit, and recent form. Edge = our win% − market-implied%.
SavvyPlays · Built different. Bet smarter. · Not financial advice. If gambling is a problem for you or someone you know, call GambleAware on 1800 858 858.
SavvyPlays — Game Preview Card
Stats sourced from official league data & partner APIs · Generated 17 July
For informational purposes only · Not gambling advice