NFL 2026 · Week 6
Away
BUF
Buffalo Bills
@
Home
LV
Las Vegas Raiders
Kick-off
Mon 19 Oct, 7:25am AEDT
Sun 18 Oct, 4:25pm ET
Venue
Allegiant Stadium
Spread
LV +5.5
Total
53.5
BUF ML
$1.42
LV ML
$3.05
AU consensus as of 15/10/2026, 11:39:22 am

Power Comparison

BUFRating +2.7
Off EPA/play
+0.236
Def EPA/play
+0.188
Exp points
32.0
Offence by zone
-.33
+.40
+.25
+.45
-.05
+.09
-.13
+.26
+.08
+.06
+.47
+.29
+.29
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.29
-.39
+.18
+.18
+.25
+.12
+.18
+.17
-.13
-.00
+.02
+.07
+.05
LVRating -2.4
Off EPA/play
+0.107
Def EPA/play
+0.151
Exp points
32.1
Offence by zone
+.36
-.48
-.20
+.04
+.10
+.26
-.18
-.06
-.08
-.05
-.41
-.03
-.07
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.51
-.20
-.04
-.05
+.15
+.37
+.11
+.02
+.05
-.47
+.44
+.09
+.05
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

BUF offence vs LV
runs off right end
+0.91 EPA/play
BUF offence vs LV
short-right passing
+0.46 EPA/play
LV offence vs BUF
short-right passing
+0.38 EPA/play

Market

Spread (LV)
Open +6 → Now +5·Move -1.0Moved toward model
AU best
LV +5.5 @ $1.89 Unibet
AU best (other side)
BUF -4.5 @ $1.90 TAB
Global best
LV +6.5 @ $1.91 ReBet
Total
Open 53.5 → Now 53.5·Move 0.0
AU best over
Over 52.5 @ $1.88 TABtouch
AU best under
Under 53.5 @ $1.90 SportsBet
Global best over
Over 52.5 @ $1.89 BetRivers
AU best BUF ML
$1.42 Bet Right
AU best LV ML
$3.05 Unibet
10 AU books · 33 total · 7 snapshots

The Call

Play: Over 52.5
Model LV +0.1 · total 64.1
Spread · Model recommendation
LV +5.5
$1.89 Unibet
Edge +5.6PLAY
Total · Model recommendation
Over 52.5
$1.88 TABtouch
Edge +11.6PLAY

This matchup's high total comes from productive offense meeting weak defensive profiles. Buffalo has the stronger offensive model rating, with short-right passing and runs around the right edge standing out against Las Vegas. The Raiders have opportunities of their own against a Bills defense whose model EPA allowed is even higher. That produces a near-even projected margin despite Buffalo's offensive advantage.

The personnel picture could alter how those opportunities are used. Buffalo reports injuries among its nickel options, which could leave space for Kirk Cousins to work inside. Brock Bowers was limited with a knee injury and Jalen Nailor missed practice in concussion protocol, so Las Vegas cannot assume its preferred receiving group will be available. Ashton Jeanty participated fully despite a foot listing. These reports have not been turned into additional points. Over 52.5 at TABtouch, priced at 1.88, qualifies as PLAY with an 11.6-point edge; LV +5.5 at Unibet, priced at 1.89, also qualifies. The 64.1-point projection is aggressive and should be read with that uncertainty. These are model recommendations, not recorded bets.

Why · LV short-right passing (+0.38 EPA/play vs BUF)

Situational

2026 through week 5 (pressure, coverage and personnel: 2025 season) · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
BUF · 506 dropbacks
Josh Allen
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.34 (379 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.52 (127 snaps)
Pressure rate faced25%
Int-worthy rate4%
Drop rate (catchable)6%
QB-fault sack rate4%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
LV defence: pressure 27% · blitz 25%
LV · 281 dropbacks
Kirk Cousins
2025 sample with ATL
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.09 (186 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.25 (95 snaps)
Pressure rate faced34%
Int-worthy rate2%
Drop rate (catchable)5%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
BUF defence: pressure 34% · blitz 33%
BUF offence vs LV coverage
ShellLV usageBUF EPA/dbLeague
Cover 338% (226 snaps)+0.17 (148 snaps)+0.06
Cover 222% (130 snaps)+0.21 (121 snaps)0.00
Cover 114% (82 snaps)+0.12 (198 snaps)+0.06
Cover 412% (69 snaps)—+0.07
LV man coverage 20% · BUF vs man +0.13, vs zone +0.24
LV offence vs BUF coverage
ShellBUF usageLV EPA/dbLeague
Cover 226% (138 snaps)-0.48 (128 snaps)0.00
Cover 322% (119 snaps)-0.06 (167 snaps)+0.06
Cover 117% (91 snaps)-0.07 (150 snaps)+0.06
2-Man11% (58 snaps)—+0.07
Cover 411% (58 snaps)-0.07 (64 snaps)+0.07
BUF man coverage 31% · LV vs man -0.03, vs zone -0.23
BUF tendencies
Play action rate24% · +0.17 vs +0.40 EPA (40 snaps)
RPO rate6% (17 snaps)
Screen rate5% (9 snaps)
Personnel11 63%, 12 12%, 22 12%, 21 9%
Def pressure / blitz / man34% / 33% / 31%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.05 (34 snaps) · neutral -0.07 (48 snaps)
LV tendencies
Play action rate22% · +0.43 vs +0.06 EPA (43 snaps)
RPO rate3% (8 snaps)
Screen rate7% (14 snaps)
Personnel11 58%, 12 35%, 13 6%
Def pressure / blitz / man27% / 25% / 20%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.11 (71 snaps) · neutral -0.15 (41 snaps)

Tracked Bets

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2026 season graded betting log through Week 5 · last updated 15 Oct 2026, 11:55 am
Recorded bets only. Published model selections and historical backtests are tracked separately.
Team-history ratings use 9,277 eligible plays from 2026 through Week 5. Prior-season weight and numerical QB overrides are zero. Historical plays by other quarterbacks remain in each team's sample; the projection is not specific to the named starter and does not automatically account for new injuries. Injuries and situational splits provide context without additional numerical adjustments. Home-spread edges require 5 points for PLAY and 10 for STRONG; Over edges require 7 and 12. Away and Under directions remain analysis only. PLAY and STRONG labels are model recommendations, not confirmation that a bet was placed. Tracked Bets includes recorded bets only. Situational charting covers 2026 through Week 5; pressure, coverage and personnel cover 2025 through Week 18.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 15/10/2026V3.2