NFL 2026 · Week 2
Away
CIN
Cincinnati Bengals
@
Home
HOU
Houston Texans
Kick-off
Mon 21 Sep, 3:00am AEST
Sun 20 Sep, 1:00pm ET
Venue
Reliant Stadium
Spread
HOU -2.5
Total
46.0
CIN ML
$2.30
HOU ML
$1.68
AU consensus as of 17/09/2026, 12:15:05 pm

Power Comparison

CINRating -1.5
Off EPA/play
+0.087
Def EPA/play
+0.114
Exp points
20.1
Offence by zone
+.22
+.06
-.07
-.06
+.12
-.06
+.02
+.09
+.09
+.10
-.04
-.02
-.02
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.03
-.12
-.16
+.15
-.07
+.19
+.24
+.01
-.11
-.15
+.06
-.03
-.04
HOURating +2.7
Off EPA/play
+0.068
Def EPA/play
+0.019
Exp points
24.7
Offence by zone
-.16
-.02
+.03
-.25
+.12
+.06
-.12
-.09
+.01
+.12
+.04
+.12
-.09
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.09
+.11
-.03
-.08
-.04
-.19
-.09
+.06
-.09
-.05
+.06
-.10
+.03
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

HOU offence vs CIN
short-right passing
+0.25 EPA/play
CIN offence vs HOU
deep-left passing
+0.31 EPA/play
CIN offence vs HOU
runs behind left guard
+0.14 EPA/play

Market

Spread (HOU)
Open -3 Now -2.5·Move +0.5
AU best
HOU -2.5 @ $1.90 Dabble AU
AU best (other side)
CIN +3 @ $1.90 TAB
Global best
HOU -2 @ $1.83 BetUS
Total
Open 46.5 Now 46.0·Move -0.5Moved toward model
AU best over
Over 45.5 @ $1.87 PointsBet (AU)
AU best under
Under 46.5 @ $1.88 TABtouch
Global best over
Over 33.5 @ $1.15 Courtside
AU best CIN ML
$2.30 Unibet
AU best HOU ML
$1.68 PlayUp
11 AU books · 33 total · 6 snapshots

The Call

No edge
Model HOU +4.6 · total 44.9
Spread · Analysis
HOU -2.5
$1.90 Dabble AU
Edge +2.1PASS
Total · Analysis
Under 46.5
$1.88 TABtouch
Edge +0.6PASS

Houston sits at -2.5 with Dabble AU offering 1.9, and the model's 4.6-point margin clears that line by only 2.1 points, well short of the 10-point bar the model needs early in the season, so this is a pass on the spread. The total is similarly thin, with just a 0.6-point edge against the market. The rating carries a hand adjustment of 2.0 points for Joe Burrow, since last season's underlying numbers were built largely on Flacco and others under centre. On last season's charting, Stroud's EPA per dropback dropped from 0.299 clean to -0.433 under pressure.

The rating still leans heavily on last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with only 1,830 plays of 2026 football in the sample so far, a small slice still mostly outweighed by that blend. The model's season record sits at 1-0 against the spread, and last season's weeks 1-5 backtest went 32-46 against the spread and 41-37 on totals, a reminder that break-even is the realistic bar this early. Nothing here reaches the model's higher early-season threshold in either market.

Why · HOU short-right passing (+0.25 EPA/play vs CIN)
Hand adjustments · CIN Joe Burrow +2.0 pts

Situational

2025 season · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
CIN · 278 dropbacks
Joe Burrow
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.27 (195 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.30 (83 snaps)
Pressure rate faced30%
Int-worthy rate2%
Drop rate (catchable)4%
QB-fault sack rate1%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
HOU defence: pressure 30% · blitz 23%
HOU · 446 dropbacks
C.J. Stroud
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.30 (317 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.43 (129 snaps)
Pressure rate faced29%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)3%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
CIN defence: pressure 30% · blitz 18%
CIN offence vs HOU coverage
ShellHOU usageCIN EPA/dbLeague
Cover 129% (178 snaps)+0.18 (148 snaps)+0.06
Cover 223% (143 snaps)-0.34 (202 snaps)0.00
Cover 322% (138 snaps)+0.02 (157 snaps)+0.06
Cover 412% (76 snaps)-0.15 (49 snaps)+0.07
Cover 68% (48 snaps)-0.03
HOU man coverage 32% · CIN vs man +0.19, vs zone -0.13
HOU offence vs CIN coverage
ShellCIN usageHOU EPA/dbLeague
Cover 332% (197 snaps)+0.17 (164 snaps)+0.06
Cover 125% (153 snaps)+0.36 (132 snaps)+0.06
Cover 220% (124 snaps)-0.02 (162 snaps)0.00
CIN man coverage 36% · HOU vs man -0.02, vs zone +0.10
CIN tendencies
Play action rate16% · -0.11 vs -0.00 EPA (110 snaps)
RPO rate9% (98 snaps)
Screen rate7% (46 snaps)
Personnel11 65%, 12 30%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / 18% / 36%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.13 (268 snaps) · neutral -0.03 (126 snaps) · heavy -0.21 (31 snaps)
HOU tendencies
Play action rate23% · +0.19 vs +0.03 EPA (148 snaps)
RPO rate2% (19 snaps)
Screen rate5% (31 snaps)
Personnel11 72%, 12 12%, 21 7%, 10 4%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / 23% / 32%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.14 (193 snaps) · neutral -0.06 (136 snaps) · heavy -0.42 (30 snaps)

Model Form

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2025 season, weeks 6-17, V3 at best available line: 29-18, +17.8% ROI
Weeks 1 to 5 are published analysis-first. Only 1,830 plays of 2026 play-by-play exist so far (week 1), so ratings are still mostly last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with the 2026 sample phased in as it grows. The model alone cannot see coaching, roster or scheme changes - only the market anchor, roster continuity and the manual override tables capture those. In last season's backtest the same approach went 32-46 against the spread and 41-37 on totals over weeks 1 to 5; 53% on totals is break-even at -110. Only edges of 10 points or more are staked (Play) before week 6; a 7-10 point edge is analysis only (Lean), not a tip.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 17/09/2026V3.2