NFL 2026 · Week 4
Away
GB
Green Bay Packers
@
Home
TB
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Kick-off
Mon 5 Oct, 4:00am AEDT
Sun 4 Oct, 1:00pm ET
Venue
Raymond James Stadium
Spread
TB +3.5
Total
38.5
GB ML
$1.56
TB ML
$2.60
AU consensus as of 01/10/2026, 12:36:06 pm

Power Comparison

GBRating -3.5
Off EPA/play
+0.068
Def EPA/play
+0.132
Exp points
18.0
Offence by zone
+.13
+.22
+.07
+.17
-.23
-.06
-.08
-.10
-.16
-.15
-.04
-.15
-.01
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.31
+.10
-.13
+.02
+.02
+.21
+.12
+.10
-.04
-.03
+.14
-.17
-.01
TBRating -0.2
Off EPA/play
+0.032
Def EPA/play
+0.035
Exp points
25.0
Offence by zone
-.22
-.15
-.28
-.03
+.13
-.18
+.08
-.04
-.02
-.07
-.02
-.04
+.13
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.12
-.02
-.13
+.12
-.11
-.16
-.09
-.09
-.15
+.05
+.00
-.08
-.03
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

GB offence vs TB
short-left passing
+0.29 EPA/play
GB offence vs TB
deep-left passing
+0.25 EPA/play
TB offence vs GB
runs off left end
+0.19 EPA/play

Market

Spread (TB)
Open +3.5 → Now +3.5·Move 0.0
AU best
TB +4 @ $1.91 Unibet
AU best (other side)
GB -3.5 @ $1.95 TAB
Global best
TB +4 @ $1.91 BetRivers
Total
Open 39.5 → Now 38.5·Move -1.0
AU best over
Over 38.5 @ $1.90 PointsBet (AU)
AU best under
Under 39.0 @ $1.89 TABtouch
Global best over
Over 38.5 @ $1.93 LowVig.ag
AU best GB ML
$1.56 Bet Right
AU best TB ML
$2.60 Unibet
11 AU books · 33 total · 9 snapshots

The Call

Play: TB +4
Model TB +7.0 · total 43.0
Spread · Model recommendation
TB +4
$1.91 Unibet
Edge +11.0PLAY
Total · Analysis
Over 38.5
$1.90 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +4.5EDGE NOTED / NO BET

The model backs Buccaneers +4 at Unibet (1.91), a full PLAY with an 11.0-point edge over the best line, margin projected at 7.0 to Tampa Bay against a market sitting at 3.5. The rating still blends last season's numbers with the market's post-offseason view of each team, scaled by roster continuity, with only 5,586 plays of 2026 football banked so far (weeks 1 to 3) still mostly outweighed by last season and the market. Green Bay's defensive power rating (-3.5) trails Tampa Bay's (-0.2), and the model's own why note points to Tampa Bay's run game off left end (+0.19 EPA/play vs Green Bay) as a lever the line hasn't fully respected; the market hasn't moved toward the model since open. Early season record sits at 1-0 against the spread.

The total gets a brief mention: Over 38.5 at PointsBet (AU) carries a 4.5-point edge, noted but short of the Lean floor, so no pick there. On 2025 charting, Green Bay's Jordan Love posted 0.254 EPA per play against Tampa Bay's Cover 3 shell, well above the league average of 0.056.

Why · TB runs off left end (+0.19 EPA/play vs GB)

Situational

2026 through week 3 (pressure, coverage and personnel: 2025 season) · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
GB · 461 dropbacks
Jordan Love
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.54 (332 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.54 (129 snaps)
Pressure rate faced28%
Int-worthy rate2%
Drop rate (catchable)5%
QB-fault sack rate1%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
TB defence: pressure 35% · blitz 46%
TB · 584 dropbacks
Baker Mayfield
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.18 (431 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.53 (153 snaps)
Pressure rate faced26%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)5%
QB-fault sack rate3%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
GB defence: pressure 31% · blitz —
GB offence vs TB coverage
ShellTB usageGB EPA/dbLeague
Cover 332% (203 snaps)+0.25 (141 snaps)+0.06
Cover 221% (137 snaps)+0.06 (130 snaps)0.00
Cover 118% (113 snaps)+0.50 (132 snaps)+0.06
Cover 411% (71 snaps)+0.36 (55 snaps)+0.07
2-Man7% (45 snaps)—+0.07
TB man coverage 29% · GB vs man +0.47, vs zone +0.16
TB offence vs GB coverage
ShellGB usageTB EPA/dbLeague
Cover 334% (204 snaps)+0.05 (168 snaps)+0.06
Cover 228% (171 snaps)+0.20 (153 snaps)0.00
Cover 117% (101 snaps)+0.01 (162 snaps)+0.06
Cover 410% (59 snaps)-0.29 (65 snaps)+0.07
GB man coverage 20% · TB vs man -0.01, vs zone +0.06
GB tendencies
Play action rate14% · — vs -0.02 EPA (19 snaps)
RPO rate4% (7 snaps)
Screen rate7% (9 snaps)
Personnel11 61%, 12 33%
Def pressure / blitz / man31% / — / 20%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.02 (52 snaps) · neutral -0.18 (35 snaps)
TB tendencies
Play action rate22% · — vs -0.22 EPA (27 snaps)
RPO rate3% (5 snaps)
Screen rate7% (8 snaps)
Personnel11 70%, 12 21%, 21 5%
Def pressure / blitz / man35% / 46% / 29%
Box vs run, EPA allowedneutral -0.16 (29 snaps)

Tracked Bets

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2026 season graded betting log through Week 3 · last updated 01 Oct 2026, 12:43 pm
Recorded bets only. Published model selections and historical backtests are tracked separately.
Weeks 1 to 5 are published analysis-first while the current-season play sample is still small. Ratings lean more on prior-season performance, market anchors, roster continuity and supported manual adjustments until the 2026 sample grows. PLAY labels are model recommendations, not confirmation that a bet has been placed. Historical early-season backtest claims are withheld from this display unless independently verified.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 01/10/2026V3.2