NFL 2026 · Week 2
Away
JAX
Jacksonville Jaguars
@
Home
DEN
Denver Broncos
Kick-off
Mon 21 Sep, 6:05am AEST
Sun 20 Sep, 4:05pm ET
Venue
Empower Field at Mile High
Spread
DEN -3
Total
45.5
JAX ML
$2.30
DEN ML
$1.70
AU consensus as of 17/09/2026, 12:15:05 pm

Power Comparison

JAXRating +5.1
Off EPA/play
+0.123
Def EPA/play
+0.030
Exp points
24.0
Offence by zone
+.10
+.02
+.03
+.12
-.03
+.23
-.08
-.03
-.06
-.05
-.03
-.06
-.02
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
-.13
-.06
+.18
-.19
-.17
-.10
-.01
+.18
+.10
-.04
+.02
-.00
+.09
DENRating -1.6
Off EPA/play
+0.046
Def EPA/play
+0.074
Exp points
18.5
Offence by zone
+.23
-.32
-.01
+.06
-.12
-.17
-.05
+.04
-.00
+.08
-.05
-.17
+.03
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
-.23
-.59
-.07
+.20
-.09
-.14
+.03
+.06
+.00
+.15
+.03
+.03
-.11
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

JAX offence vs DEN
short-left passing
+0.32 EPA/play
DEN offence vs JAX
runs behind left guard
+0.21 EPA/play
JAX offence vs DEN
inside runs
+0.10 EPA/play

Market

Spread (DEN)
Open -2.5 Now -2.5·Move 0.0
AU best
DEN -2.5 @ $1.83 PointsBet (AU)
AU best (other side)
JAX +3.5 @ $1.82 Dabble AU
Global best
DEN -2 @ $1.83 BetUS
Total
Open 44.5 Now 45.5·Move +1.0
AU best over
Over 45.0 @ $1.89 TABtouch
AU best under
Under 46.0 @ $1.88 PlayUp
Global best over
Over 25.5 @ $1.02 Courtside
AU best JAX ML
$2.30 Unibet
AU best DEN ML
$1.70 Bet Right
11 AU books · 33 total · 6 snapshots

The Call

Lean: JAX +3.5
Model DEN -5.5 · total 42.5
Spread · Analysis
JAX +3.5
$1.82 Dabble AU
Edge +8.0LEAN
Total · Analysis
Under 46
$1.88 PlayUp
Edge +2.5PASS

The model has Jacksonville by 5.5, well clear of Denver's -3.0 at home, and sees the spread gap at 8.0 points against the best Australian line of JAX +3.5 with Dabble AU. That's a Lean, not a Play, since weeks 1 to 5 need a 10-point edge before the model treats a game as a play, and the early-season record sits at 1-0 against the spread so far. The rating is still mostly last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity; only 1,830 plays of 2026 football exist so far, a small sample still mostly outweighed by that blend. The model's read leans on Jacksonville's short-left passing game, rated at +0.32 EPA/play against Denver's defence in that zone.

On 2025 season charting, Trevor Lawrence averaged -0.521 EPA per dropback under pressure, worse than Bo Nix's -0.377, while Denver's defence brought pressure on 34% of snaps that year. The market hasn't moved toward the model's view either, with Denver still favourites at home.

Why · JAX short-left passing (+0.32 EPA/play vs DEN, DEN's weakest zone)

Situational

2025 season · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
JAX · 600 dropbacks
Trevor Lawrence
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.26 (442 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.52 (158 snaps)
Pressure rate faced26%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)10%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
DEN defence: pressure 35% · blitz 32%
DEN · 638 dropbacks
Bo Nix
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.26 (466 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.38 (172 snaps)
Pressure rate faced27%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)6%
QB-fault sack rate1%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
JAX defence: pressure 27% · blitz 26%
JAX offence vs DEN coverage
ShellDEN usageJAX EPA/dbLeague
Cover 131% (215 snaps)+0.09 (124 snaps)+0.06
Cover 323% (162 snaps)+0.04 (207 snaps)+0.06
Cover 216% (112 snaps)+0.12 (141 snaps)0.00
Cover 49% (61 snaps)+0.09 (67 snaps)+0.07
2-Man7% (50 snaps)+0.07
Cover 07% (45 snaps)+0.10
DEN man coverage 45% · JAX vs man +0.14, vs zone +0.06
DEN offence vs JAX coverage
ShellJAX usageDEN EPA/dbLeague
Cover 330% (209 snaps)+0.09 (205 snaps)+0.06
Cover 226% (183 snaps)+0.06 (182 snaps)0.00
Cover 116% (114 snaps)+0.26 (120 snaps)+0.06
Cover 410% (69 snaps)+0.11 (70 snaps)+0.07
Cover 68% (56 snaps)-0.03
JAX man coverage 24% · DEN vs man +0.25, vs zone +0.07
JAX tendencies
Play action rate22% · +0.10 vs +0.08 EPA (141 snaps)
RPO rate5% (51 snaps)
Screen rate8% (52 snaps)
Personnel11 71%, 12 22%
Def pressure / blitz / man27% / 26% / 24%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.06 (196 snaps) · neutral -0.16 (107 snaps)
DEN tendencies
Play action rate24% · +0.06 vs +0.13 EPA (163 snaps)
RPO rate9% (95 snaps)
Screen rate11% (76 snaps)
Personnel11 65%, 12 14%, 22 8%, 21 8%
Def pressure / blitz / man35% / 32% / 45%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.09 (238 snaps) · neutral -0.17 (102 snaps)

Model Form

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2025 season, weeks 6-17, V3 at best available line: 29-18, +17.8% ROI
Weeks 1 to 5 are published analysis-first. Only 1,830 plays of 2026 play-by-play exist so far (week 1), so ratings are still mostly last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with the 2026 sample phased in as it grows. The model alone cannot see coaching, roster or scheme changes - only the market anchor, roster continuity and the manual override tables capture those. In last season's backtest the same approach went 32-46 against the spread and 41-37 on totals over weeks 1 to 5; 53% on totals is break-even at -110. Only edges of 10 points or more are staked (Play) before week 6; a 7-10 point edge is analysis only (Lean), not a tip.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 17/09/2026V3.2