NFL 2026 · Week 2
Away
LV
Las Vegas Raiders
@
Home
LAC
Los Angeles Chargers
Kick-off
Mon 21 Sep, 6:05am AEST
Sun 20 Sep, 4:05pm ET
Venue
SoFi Stadium
Spread
LAC -6.5
Total
43.5
LV ML
$3.50
LAC ML
$1.33
AU consensus as of 17/09/2026, 12:15:05 pm

Power Comparison

LVRating -4.0
Off EPA/play
+0.003
Def EPA/play
+0.077
Exp points
16.6
Offence by zone
-.06
-.10
-.05
-.05
+.10
-.10
-.13
-.08
-.12
-.15
-.02
-.05
+.04
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
-.01
-.07
-.08
+.02
+.12
+.00
-.02
-.22
+.03
+.02
-.02
-.08
+.04
LACRating +0.4
Off EPA/play
+0.070
Def EPA/play
+0.062
Exp points
23.6
Offence by zone
+.07
+.04
-.24
+.09
-.15
-.06
+.06
-.12
+.01
+.01
+.04
-.06
+.12
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.16
-.10
-.22
-.02
-.01
+.07
+.01
-.01
-.06
-.07
-.04
-.03
-.09
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

LAC offence vs LV
short-left passing
+0.11 EPA/play
LAC offence vs LV
runs off right tackle
+0.16 EPA/play
LV offence vs LAC
short-middle passing
+0.10 EPA/play

Market

Spread (LAC)
Open -7 Now -6.5·Move +0.5
AU best
LAC -6 @ $1.87 PlayUp
AU best (other side)
LV +6.5 @ $2.00 Dabble AU
Global best
LAC -6 @ $1.87 PlayUp
Total
Open 43.5 Now 43.5·Move 0.0
AU best over
Over 43.0 @ $1.87 PlayUp
AU best under
Under 43.5 @ $1.90 PointsBet (AU)
Global best over
Over 26.5 @ $1.04 Courtside
AU best LV ML
$3.50 SportsBet
AU best LAC ML
$1.33 PointsBet (AU)
10 AU books · 32 total · 6 snapshots

The Call

No edge
Model LAC +7.0 · total 40.3
Spread · Analysis
LAC -6
$1.87 PlayUp
Edge +1.0PASS
Total · Analysis
Under 43.5
$1.90 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +2.7PASS

Chargers are favoured at home, and the model's 7.0-point margin is close to the market's -6.5, leaving just a 1.0-point gap against the best line (-6 at PlayUp, 1.87), short of the 10-point bar the model needs before week 6. The total is the primary market: the model's 40.3 projection sits under PointsBet (AU)'s 43.5 (1.90), a 2.7-point edge, also short of the threshold. Both markets are PASS, so this is analysis, not a tip. Because it's early season, the rating blends last year's numbers with the market's post-offseason view of each team, scaled by roster continuity; the 2026 sample is small at 1,830 plays, still mostly outweighed by last season and the market. The model's early-season record sits at 1-0 against the spread and 0-0 on totals.

The lean toward the under fits the matchup: on last season's charting, Justin Herbert dropped from 0.318 EPA per dropback clean to -0.531 under pressure, and Las Vegas' defence brought pressure at 27% last season. None of this clears the model's early-season bar, so the gap is simply noted.

Why · LAC short-left passing (+0.11 EPA/play vs LV)

Situational

2025 season · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
LV · 281 dropbacks
Kirk Cousins
2025 sample with ATL
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.09 (186 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.25 (95 snaps)
Pressure rate faced34%
Int-worthy rate2%
Drop rate (catchable)5%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
LAC defence: pressure 30% · blitz 21%
LAC · 566 dropbacks
Justin Herbert
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.32 (359 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.53 (207 snaps)
Pressure rate faced37%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)5%
QB-fault sack rate3%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
LV defence: pressure 27% · blitz 22%
LV offence vs LAC coverage
ShellLAC usageLV EPA/dbLeague
Cover 331% (184 snaps)-0.06 (167 snaps)+0.06
Cover 226% (151 snaps)-0.48 (128 snaps)0.00
Cover 113% (77 snaps)-0.07 (150 snaps)+0.06
Cover 412% (68 snaps)-0.07 (64 snaps)+0.07
LAC man coverage 22% · LV vs man -0.03, vs zone -0.23
LAC offence vs LV coverage
ShellLV usageLAC EPA/dbLeague
Cover 338% (226 snaps)+0.05 (158 snaps)+0.06
Cover 222% (130 snaps)+0.07 (130 snaps)0.00
Cover 114% (82 snaps)+0.05 (193 snaps)+0.06
Cover 412% (69 snaps)-0.36 (59 snaps)+0.07
LV man coverage 20% · LAC vs man +0.07, vs zone -0.04
LV tendencies
Play action rate25% · -0.07 vs -0.20 EPA (149 snaps)
RPO rate4% (39 snaps)
Screen rate8% (49 snaps)
Personnel11 58%, 12 35%, 13 6%
Def pressure / blitz / man27% / 22% / 20%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.05 (198 snaps) · neutral -0.14 (232 snaps) · heavy -0.34 (30 snaps)
LAC tendencies
Play action rate23% · +0.06 vs -0.02 EPA (157 snaps)
RPO rate3% (28 snaps)
Screen rate6% (40 snaps)
Personnel11 58%, 21 14%, 22 7%, 20 7%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / 21% / 22%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.06 (240 snaps) · neutral -0.27 (103 snaps)

Model Form

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2025 season, weeks 6-17, V3 at best available line: 29-18, +17.8% ROI
Weeks 1 to 5 are published analysis-first. Only 1,830 plays of 2026 play-by-play exist so far (week 1), so ratings are still mostly last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with the 2026 sample phased in as it grows. The model alone cannot see coaching, roster or scheme changes - only the market anchor, roster continuity and the manual override tables capture those. In last season's backtest the same approach went 32-46 against the spread and 41-37 on totals over weeks 1 to 5; 53% on totals is break-even at -110. Only edges of 10 points or more are staked (Play) before week 6; a 7-10 point edge is analysis only (Lean), not a tip.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 17/09/2026V3.2