NFL 2026 · Week 2
Away
MIA
Miami Dolphins
@
Home
SF
San Francisco 49ers
Kick-off
Mon 21 Sep, 6:25am AEST
Sun 20 Sep, 4:25pm ET
Venue
Levi's Stadium
Spread
SF -13.5
Total
45.0
MIA ML
$7.75
SF ML
$1.12
AU consensus as of 17/09/2026, 12:15:05 pm

Power Comparison

MIARating -4.0
Off EPA/play
+0.045
Def EPA/play
+0.117
Exp points
19.0
Offence by zone
-.19
-.12
-.08
+.09
-.00
-.14
-.09
-.09
+.00
-.20
+.03
-.05
-.04
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
-.09
-.14
-.14
+.04
+.27
+.13
-.15
+.07
-.11
+.09
-.13
+.01
+.04
SFRating +1.8
Off EPA/play
+0.107
Def EPA/play
+0.073
Exp points
29.2
Offence by zone
-.15
+.38
+.04
+.04
+.10
+.01
+.03
+.09
+.01
+.09
-.12
-.00
-.04
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
-.01
+.10
-.19
+.12
-.27
.00
+.06
-.12
+.07
+.08
+.09
-.07
-.10
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

SF offence vs MIA
short-middle passing
+0.37 EPA/play
MIA offence vs SF
short-left passing
+0.21 EPA/play
SF offence vs MIA
inside runs
+0.18 EPA/play

Market

Spread (SF)
Open -13.5 Now -13.5·Move 0.0
AU best
SF -12.5 @ $1.84 SportsBet
AU best (other side)
MIA +15.5 @ $1.88 Dabble AU
Global best
SF -12.5 @ $1.84 SportsBet
Total
Open 45.5 Now 45.0·Move -0.5
AU best over
Over 44.5 @ $1.90 PointsBet (AU)
AU best under
Under 45.5 @ $1.90 SportsBet
Global best over
Over 29.5 @ $1.06 Courtside
AU best MIA ML
$7.75 Neds
AU best SF ML
$1.12 Dabble AU
11 AU books · 33 total · 6 snapshots

The Call

Edge noted / no bet: Over 44.5
Model SF +10.1 · total 48.2
Spread · Analysis
MIA +15.5
$1.88 Dabble AU
Edge +2.4PASS
Total · Analysis
Over 44.5
$1.90 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +3.7EDGE NOTED / NO BET

The primary market here is the total. The model's 48.2 projection sits above the market, with the AU best line at Over 44.5 (PointsBet, 1.90) showing an edge of 3.7 points, well short of the 10-point Play bar in place for weeks 1 to 5. That's a NOTED edge only, and the model's early-season record stands at 1-0 against the spread and 0-0 on totals. The rating is still mostly last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with only 1,830 plays of 2026 football in the sample so far, still small and outweighed by that blend. San Francisco's short-middle passing produced +0.37 EPA/play against Miami's defence, the matchup the model is leaning on for the total. The rating also carries hand adjustments of 1.2 points for Brock Purdy and -1.2 points for Malik Willis.

On the spread, San Francisco is favoured at -13.5 with Miami +15.5 the best AU number (Dabble AU, 1.88), and the model's 10.1-point margin projection produces only a 2.4-point edge, a clear PASS.

Why · SF short-middle passing (+0.37 EPA/play vs MIA, MIA's weakest zone)
Hand adjustments · MIA Malik Willis -1.2 pts · SF Brock Purdy +1.2 pts

Situational

2025 season · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
MIA · 38 dropbacks
Malik Willis
only 38 2025 dropbacks (min 100)
SF defence: pressure 23% · blitz 22%
SF · 298 dropbacks
Brock Purdy
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.45 (214 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.45 (84 snaps)
Pressure rate faced28%
Int-worthy rate4%
Drop rate (catchable)6%
QB-fault sack rate1%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
MIA defence: pressure 27% · blitz 33%
MIA offence vs SF coverage
ShellSF usageMIA EPA/dbLeague
Cover 332% (201 snaps)-0.08 (191 snaps)+0.06
Cover 121% (130 snaps)+0.02 (66 snaps)+0.06
Cover 217% (110 snaps)-0.22 (139 snaps)0.00
Cover 414% (88 snaps)+0.29 (61 snaps)+0.07
Cover 69% (55 snaps)-0.03
SF man coverage 25% · MIA vs man +0.25, vs zone -0.07
SF offence vs MIA coverage
ShellMIA usageSF EPA/dbLeague
Cover 235% (208 snaps)+0.13 (152 snaps)0.00
Cover 324% (143 snaps)+0.24 (164 snaps)+0.06
Cover 120% (120 snaps)+0.05 (134 snaps)+0.06
Cover 47% (42 snaps)+0.28 (64 snaps)+0.07
MIA man coverage 28% · SF vs man +0.14, vs zone +0.17
MIA tendencies
Play action rate27% · +0.12 vs -0.06 EPA (146 snaps)
RPO rate6% (54 snaps)
Screen rate11% (60 snaps)
Personnel11 39%, 21 29%, 12 11%, 22 8%
Def pressure / blitz / man27% / 33% / 28%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.00 (189 snaps) · neutral -0.01 (172 snaps) · heavy -0.12 (62 snaps)
SF tendencies
Play action rate22% · +0.15 vs +0.17 EPA (140 snaps)
RPO rate1% (7 snaps)
Screen rate6% (37 snaps)
Personnel11 43%, 21 37%, 12 11%, 22 7%
Def pressure / blitz / man23% / 22% / 25%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.03 (322 snaps) · neutral -0.11 (61 snaps)

Model Form

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2025 season, weeks 6-17, V3 at best available line: 29-18, +17.8% ROI
Weeks 1 to 5 are published analysis-first. Only 1,830 plays of 2026 play-by-play exist so far (week 1), so ratings are still mostly last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with the 2026 sample phased in as it grows. The model alone cannot see coaching, roster or scheme changes - only the market anchor, roster continuity and the manual override tables capture those. In last season's backtest the same approach went 32-46 against the spread and 41-37 on totals over weeks 1 to 5; 53% on totals is break-even at -110. Only edges of 10 points or more are staked (Play) before week 6; a 7-10 point edge is analysis only (Lean), not a tip.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 17/09/2026V3.2