NFL 2026 · Week 2
Away
MIN
Minnesota Vikings
@
Home
CHI
Chicago Bears
Kick-off
Mon 21 Sep, 3:00am AEST
Sun 20 Sep, 1:00pm ET
Venue
Soldier Field
Spread
CHI -4.5
Total
48.5
MIN ML
$2.85
CHI ML
$1.48
AU consensus as of 17/09/2026, 12:15:05 pm

Power Comparison

MINRating +2.4
Off EPA/play
+0.052
Def EPA/play
+0.008
Exp points
22.0
Offence by zone
+.23
+.01
-.27
-.14
-.05
.00
-.04
+.04
+.02
+.07
+.10
-.03
-.13
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.11
+.30
+.07
-.12
-.16
-.17
-.08
+.01
-.04
-.09
-.06
-.10
+.10
CHIRating +2.0
Off EPA/play
+0.134
Def EPA/play
+0.098
Exp points
24.0
Offence by zone
+.14
+.02
-.18
+.04
-.03
+.12
+.19
+.02
+.09
+.10
+.02
+.11
-.07
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
-.08
-.06
-.08
-.00
+.17
+.09
-.01
-.02
-.05
-.13
+.19
-.01
+.07
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

MIN offence vs CHI
runs off right end
+0.29 EPA/play
CHI offence vs MIN
deep-middle passing
+0.32 EPA/play
CHI offence vs MIN
deep-left passing
+0.25 EPA/play

Market

Spread (CHI)
Open -5.5 → Now -4.5·Move +1.0Moved toward model
AU best
CHI -4 @ $1.88 PlayUp
AU best (other side)
MIN +5.5 @ $1.92 Dabble AU
Global best
CHI -4 @ $1.88 PlayUp
Total
Open 49.5 → Now 48.0·Move -1.5Moved toward model
AU best over
Over 47.5 @ $1.90 PointsBet (AU)
AU best under
Under 48.5 @ $1.88 TABtouch
Global best over
Over 29.5 @ $1.03 Courtside
AU best MIN ML
$2.85 Betr
AU best CHI ML
$1.48 PointsBet (AU)
11 AU books · 33 total · 6 snapshots

The Call

No edge
Model CHI +2.0 · total 46.0
Spread · Analysis
MIN +5.5
$1.92 Dabble AU
Edge +2.0PASS
Total · Analysis
Under 48.5
$1.88 TABtouch
Edge +1.5PASS

The model gives Chicago only a slim edge, pricing the margin at 2.0 points against a market line of -4.5, with the best line at 5.5 on the Vikings via Dabble AU at 1.92, an edge of just 2.0 points, well short of the 10-point bar required before week 6, so this is a PASS. Chicago's deep-middle passing rates at +0.32 EPA/play against Minnesota's coverage, but that alone doesn't move the number far enough. The rating carries a hand adjustment of 1.2 points for Kyler Murray, reflecting his standing as the established starter over the second-year option.

With only 1,830 plays of 2026 football recorded, the rating still leans mostly on last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity. On last season's charting, Murray's EPA per dropback fell from 0.263 clean to -0.644 under pressure. The model sits 1-0 against the spread to open this season.

Why · CHI deep-middle passing (+0.32 EPA/play vs MIN, MIN's weakest zone)
Hand adjustments · MIN Kyler Murray +1.2 pts

Situational

2025 season · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
MIN · 177 dropbacks
Kyler Murray
2025 sample with ARI
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.26 (132 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.64 (45 snaps)
Pressure rate faced25%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)5%
QB-fault sack rate3%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
CHI defence: pressure 28% · blitz 28%
CHI · 594 dropbacks
Caleb Williams
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.24 (416 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.32 (178 snaps)
Pressure rate faced30%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)8%
QB-fault sack rate1%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
MIN defence: pressure 34% · blitz 46%
MIN offence vs CHI coverage
ShellCHI usageMIN EPA/dbLeague
Cover 131% (183 snaps)-0.42 (125 snaps)+0.06
Cover 225% (151 snaps)-0.12 (147 snaps)0.00
Cover 323% (136 snaps)+0.11 (155 snaps)+0.06
CHI man coverage 42% · MIN vs man -0.33, vs zone -0.08
CHI offence vs MIN coverage
ShellMIN usageCHI EPA/dbLeague
Cover 237% (195 snaps)-0.02 (134 snaps)0.00
Cover 324% (127 snaps)+0.08 (214 snaps)+0.06
Cover 412% (63 snaps)+0.21 (60 snaps)+0.07
Cover 18% (40 snaps)+0.18 (140 snaps)+0.06
MIN man coverage 18% · CHI vs man +0.20, vs zone +0.09
MIN tendencies
Play action rate26% · -0.21 vs -0.14 EPA (147 snaps)
RPO rate5% (46 snaps)
Screen rate9% (51 snaps)
Personnel11 65%, 12 20%, 21 8%
Def pressure / blitz / man34% / 46% / 18%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.11 (279 snaps) · neutral -0.05 (170 snaps) · heavy -0.07 (41 snaps)
CHI tendencies
Play action rate32% · +0.19 vs +0.08 EPA (203 snaps)
RPO rate5% (53 snaps)
Screen rate9% (59 snaps)
Personnel11 53%, 12 36%, 13 8%
Def pressure / blitz / man28% / 28% / 42%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.01 (237 snaps) · neutral -0.08 (144 snaps) · heavy -0.10 (44 snaps)

Tracked Bets

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2026 season graded betting log through Week 1 · last updated 17 Sept 2026, 04:46 pm
Recorded bets only. Published model selections and historical backtests are tracked separately.
Weeks 1 to 5 are published analysis-first while the current-season play sample is still small. Ratings lean more on prior-season performance, market anchors, roster continuity and supported manual adjustments until the 2026 sample grows. PLAY labels are model recommendations, not confirmation that a bet has been placed. Historical early-season backtest claims are withheld from this display unless independently verified.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 17/09/2026V3.2