NFL 2026 · Week 7
Away
NE
New England Patriots
@
Home
CHI
Chicago Bears
Kick-off
Fri 23 Oct, 11:15am AEDT
Thu 22 Oct, 8:15pm ET
Venue
Soldier Field
Spread
CHI -3
Total
50.5
NE ML
$2.40
CHI ML
$1.64
AU consensus as of 22/10/2026, 9:43:37 am

Power Comparison

NERating +2.1
Off EPA/play
+0.093
Def EPA/play
+0.055
Exp points
19.9
Offence by zone
-.18
+.07
+.50
-.16
+.11
+.36
+.20
+.00
+.08
-.16
+.07
-.18
+.06
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.14
+.12
-.04
-.08
+.13
-.01
+.06
-.01
+.05
-.05
-.15
-.08
+.01
CHIRating +3.3
Off EPA/play
+0.086
Def EPA/play
+0.025
Exp points
24.2
Offence by zone
+.13
-.30
-.30
-.04
+.24
+.07
+.07
-.15
+.15
-.38
+.01
+.30
-.11
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.10
+.45
+.02
-.20
-.13
-.04
-.05
-.06
+.08
-.12
+.05
+.13
+.19
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

NE offence vs CHI
short-right passing
+0.33 EPA/play
CHI offence vs NE
short-middle passing
+0.37 EPA/play
NE offence vs CHI
deep-right passing
+0.52 EPA/play

Market

Spread (CHI)
Open -3 → Now -3·Move 0.0
AU best
CHI -2.5 @ $1.80 PointsBet (AU)
AU best (other side)
NE +3.5 @ $1.80 Dabble AU
Global best
CHI -2.5 @ $1.80 PointsBet (AU)
Total
Open 50.5 → Now 50.5·Move 0.0
AU best over
Over 50.5 @ $1.91 TABtouch
AU best under
Under 50.5 @ $1.95 PointsBet (AU)
Global best over
Over 50.5 @ $1.93 LowVig.ag
AU best NE ML
$2.40 PointsBet (AU)
AU best CHI ML
$1.64 Dabble AU
10 AU books · 33 total · 8 snapshots

The Call

Lean: Under 50.5
Model CHI +4.3 · total 44.1
Spread · Analysis
CHI -2.5
$1.80 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +1.8PASS
Total · Analysis
Under 50.5
$1.95 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +6.4LEAN

Under 50.5 at PointsBet (AU), priced at 1.95, is the clearer model disagreement, with a 6.4-point gap and a LEAN label. Chicago's stronger defensive profile helps produce a forecast of Chicago 24.2, New England 19.9, although both offences have useful short-passing matchups. The Patriots can work to the right; Chicago's best highlighted route is through the middle. Caleb Williams returned against Atlanta and has no final injury designation, while Drake Maye practised fully and also has no designation.

The personnel picture leaves room for that lower-scoring view to fail. New England is missing Carlton Davis III and other cornerbacks, while its offensive line is without Ben Brown and Alijah Vera-Tucker. Chicago is without Kyle Monangai and Jack Sanborn, with T.J. Edwards doubtful. Those absences have not been converted into extra points adjustments. Chicago -2.5 at PointsBet (AU) has only a 1.8-point gap and remains PASS. The Under is analysis only, with no formal recommendation.

Why · CHI short-middle passing (+0.37 EPA/play vs NE)

Situational

2026 through week 6 (pressure, coverage and personnel: 2025 season) · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
NE · 540 dropbacks
Drake Maye
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.55 (368 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.24 (172 snaps)
Pressure rate faced32%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)4%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
CHI defence: pressure 28% · blitz 42%
CHI · 594 dropbacks
Caleb Williams
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.24 (416 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.32 (178 snaps)
Pressure rate faced30%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)8%
QB-fault sack rate1%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
NE defence: pressure 27% · blitz 36%
NE offence vs CHI coverage
ShellCHI usageNE EPA/dbLeague
Cover 131% (183 snaps)+0.49 (147 snaps)+0.06
Cover 225% (151 snaps)+0.21 (161 snaps)0.00
Cover 323% (136 snaps)+0.37 (169 snaps)+0.06
CHI man coverage 42% · NE vs man +0.37, vs zone +0.28
CHI offence vs NE coverage
ShellNE usageCHI EPA/dbLeague
Cover 330% (176 snaps)+0.08 (214 snaps)+0.06
Cover 226% (155 snaps)-0.02 (134 snaps)0.00
Cover 126% (152 snaps)+0.18 (140 snaps)+0.06
Cover 49% (55 snaps)+0.21 (60 snaps)+0.07
NE man coverage 31% · CHI vs man +0.20, vs zone +0.09
NE tendencies
Play action rate23% · -0.07 vs +0.26 EPA (51 snaps)
RPO rate2% (8 snaps)
Screen rate8% (18 snaps)
Personnel11 52%, 12 22%, 21 19%, 22 6%
Def pressure / blitz / man27% / 36% / 31%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.19 (52 snaps) · neutral +0.02 (57 snaps)
CHI tendencies
Play action rate32% · +0.02 vs +0.12 EPA (75 snaps)
RPO rate5% (20 snaps)
Screen rate11% (25 snaps)
Personnel11 53%, 12 36%, 13 8%
Def pressure / blitz / man28% / 42% / 42%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.17 (35 snaps) · neutral +0.01 (57 snaps)

Tracked Bets

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2026 season graded betting log through Week 6 · last updated 22 Oct 2026, 09:48 am
Recorded bets only. Published model selections and historical backtests are tracked separately.
Team-history ratings use 10,984 eligible plays from 2026 through Week 6. Prior-season weight and numerical QB overrides are zero. Historical plays by other quarterbacks remain in each team's sample; the projection is not specific to the named starter and does not automatically account for new injuries. Injuries and situational splits provide context without additional numerical adjustments. Home-spread edges require 5 points for PLAY and 10 for STRONG; Over edges require 7 and 12. Away and Under directions remain analysis only. PLAY and STRONG labels are model recommendations, not confirmation that a bet was placed. Tracked Bets includes recorded bets only. Situational charting covers 2026 through Week 6; pressure, coverage and personnel cover 2025 through Week 18.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 21/10/2026V3.2