NFL 2026 · Week 7
Kick-off
Mon 26 Oct, 4:00am AEDT
Sun 25 Oct, 1:00pm ET
AU consensus as of 22/10/2026, 9:43:37 am
Power Comparison
NYGRating -2.1
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
HOURating +4.6
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.
Matchup Edges
HOU offence vs NYG
short-middle passing
+0.50 EPA/play
HOU offence vs NYG
short-right passing
+0.34 EPA/play
NYG offence vs HOU
deep-left passing
+0.60 EPA/play
Market
Spread (HOU)
Open -9.5 → Now -10.5·Move -1.0Moved toward model
AU bestHOU -9.5 @ $1.88 Dabble AU
AU best (other side)NYG +10.5 @ $1.91 Unibet
Global bestHOU -9.5 @ $1.88 Dabble AU
Total
Open 43.0 → Now 43.0·Move 0.0
AU best overOver 42.5 @ $1.90 PointsBet (AU)
AU best underUnder 43.5 @ $1.92 Dabble AU
Global best overOver 42.5 @ $1.90 PointsBet (AU)
AU best NYG ML
$5.10 SportsBet
AU best HOU ML
$1.20 Bet Right
10 AU books · 33 total · 8 snapshots
The Call
Rating withheld - QB adjustment unavailable
No rating basis
NYG: The Giants have named J.J. McCarthy to start Week 7 in place of Jameis Winston. The existing model has no supported McCarthy adjustment; its mixed-quarterback team history is not a McCarthy-specific forecast. Both market ratings are withheld.
Spread · Rating withheld
Unrated
RATING WITHHELD / UNRATEDTotal · Rating withheld
Unrated
RATING WITHHELD / UNRATEDThe Giants have confirmed quarterback J.J. McCarthy as their starter, replacing Jameis Winston, but the existing model cannot price that change without a supported adjustment. Both markets are UNRATED. John Harbaugh's dated announcement supersedes the generic team listing that still names Winston first. This is a valuation limitation around a named starter, rather than uncertainty about who has been selected.
Houston's short-middle and short-right passing matchups are favourable in the team-history data, giving C.J. Stroud potential routes to sustain drives. New York's defensive preparation is complicated by Jevon Holland and Greg Newsome II missing practice. Protection for McCarthy is also a concern with Andrew Thomas, Jermaine Eluemunor and Marcus Mbow absent. Houston has substantial uncertainty of its own, including Azeez Al-Shaair, Jalen Pitre, Dalton Schultz and several tackles missing Wednesday practice. Those reports are provisional. The historical profiles describe the matchup, but no spread, total or McCarthy-specific projection is published.
Why · The Giants have named J.J. McCarthy to start Week 7 in place of Jameis Winston. The existing model has no supported McCarthy adjustment; its mixed-quarterback team history is not a McCarthy-specific forecast. Both market ratings are withheld.
Situational
2026 through week 6 (pressure, coverage and personnel: 2025 season) · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
NYG · 0 dropbacks
J.J. McCarthy
The Giants have named J.J. McCarthy to start Week 7 in place of Jameis Winston. The existing model has no supported McCarthy adjustment; its mixed-quarterback team history is not a McCarthy-specific forecast. Both market ratings are withheld.
HOU · 446 dropbacks
C.J. Stroud
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.30 (317 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.43 (129 snaps)
Pressure rate faced29%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)3%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
NYG defence: pressure 30% · blitz 42%
NYG offence vs HOU coverage
| Shell | HOU usage | NYG EPA/db | League |
|---|
| Cover 1 | 29% (178 snaps) | +0.06 (171 snaps) | +0.06 |
| Cover 2 | 23% (143 snaps) | -0.23 (133 snaps) | 0.00 |
| Cover 3 | 22% (138 snaps) | +0.38 (172 snaps) | +0.06 |
| Cover 4 | 12% (76 snaps) | -0.08 (59 snaps) | +0.07 |
| Cover 6 | 8% (48 snaps) | — | -0.03 |
HOU man coverage 32% · NYG vs man +0.00, vs zone +0.06
HOU offence vs NYG coverage
| Shell | NYG usage | HOU EPA/db | League |
|---|
| Cover 1 | 31% (191 snaps) | +0.36 (132 snaps) | +0.06 |
| Cover 3 | 26% (160 snaps) | +0.17 (164 snaps) | +0.06 |
| Cover 2 | 15% (94 snaps) | -0.02 (162 snaps) | 0.00 |
| Cover 4 | 15% (92 snaps) | +0.16 (59 snaps) | +0.07 |
NYG man coverage 40% · HOU vs man -0.02, vs zone +0.10
NYG tendencies
Play action rate20% · +0.05 vs +0.06 EPA (47 snaps)
RPO rate3% (10 snaps)
Screen rate6% (14 snaps)
Personnel11 61%, 12 33%, 13 5%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / 42% / 40%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.04 (59 snaps) · neutral -0.05 (69 snaps)
HOU tendencies
Play action rate21% · +0.30 vs +0.11 EPA (50 snaps)
RPO rate4% (16 snaps)
Screen rate6% (13 snaps)
Personnel11 72%, 12 12%, 21 7%, 10 4%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / 23% / 32%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.12 (47 snaps) · neutral -0.13 (74 snaps)
Tracked Bets
2026 season graded betting log through Week 6 · last updated 22 Oct 2026, 09:48 am
Recorded bets only. Published model selections and historical backtests are tracked separately.
Team-history ratings use 10,984 eligible plays from 2026 through Week 6. Prior-season weight and numerical QB overrides are zero. Historical plays by other quarterbacks remain in each team's sample; the projection is not specific to the named starter and does not automatically account for new injuries. Injuries and situational splits provide context without additional numerical adjustments. Home-spread edges require 5 points for PLAY and 10 for STRONG; Over edges require 7 and 12. Away and Under directions remain analysis only. PLAY and STRONG labels are model recommendations, not confirmation that a bet was placed. Tracked Bets includes recorded bets only. Situational charting covers 2026 through Week 6; pressure, coverage and personnel cover 2025 through Week 18.
Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.
savvyplays.comPublished 21/10/2026V3.2