NFL 2026 · Week 2
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Eagles
@
Home
TEN
Tennessee Titans
Kick-off
Mon 21 Sep, 3:00am AEST
Sun 20 Sep, 1:00pm ET
Venue
Nissan Stadium
Spread
TEN +7
Total
39.5
PHI ML
$1.30
TEN ML
$3.82
AU consensus as of 17/09/2026, 12:15:05 pm

Power Comparison

PHIRating +0.2
Off EPA/play
+0.051
Def EPA/play
+0.047
Exp points
22.3
Offence by zone
-.17
-.05
+.03
-.09
+.11
-.10
+.04
-.08
+.15
+.05
+.05
+.03
-.10
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.02
+.23
-.16
-.13
-.07
-.05
-.09
-.05
+.02
+.10
+.01
+.07
-.10
TENRating -4.3
Off EPA/play
+0.040
Def EPA/play
+0.119
Exp points
19.7
Offence by zone
-.13
-.03
+.11
-.08
-.04
-.10
-.02
+.01
+.09
+.02
+.07
-.02
-.06
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.03
+.15
+.32
+.10
+.15
+.01
+.05
-.05
+.02
-.06
-.12
+.03
-.04
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

PHI offence vs TEN
deep-right passing
+0.35 EPA/play
PHI offence vs TEN
short-middle passing
+0.26 EPA/play
PHI offence vs TEN
runs off left tackle
+0.17 EPA/play

Market

Spread (TEN)
Open +7 Now +7·Move 0.0
AU best
TEN +7.5 @ $1.92 Dabble AU
AU best (other side)
PHI -7 @ $1.91 Unibet
Global best
TEN +7.5 @ $1.92 Dabble AU
Total
Open 39.5 Now 39.5·Move 0.0
AU best over
Over 39.5 @ $1.90 SportsBet
AU best under
Under 40.0 @ $1.85 PlayUp
Global best over
Over 22.5 @ $1.04 Courtside
AU best PHI ML
$1.30 Dabble AU
AU best TEN ML
$3.82 SportsBet
11 AU books · 33 total · 6 snapshots

The Call

Edge noted / no bet: TEN +7.5
Model TEN -2.5 · total 42.0
Spread · Analysis
TEN +7.5
$1.92 Dabble AU
Edge +5.0EDGE NOTED / NO BET
Total · Analysis
Over 39.5
$1.90 SportsBet
Edge +2.5PASS

The model has Philadelphia winning by 2.5 on paper but the best local line has Tennessee getting 7.5 points, so the gap on the primary market sits at 5.0 points, short of the Lean floor at this stage of the season. That's an edge worth noting rather than acting on, and the model is 1-0 against the spread so far in 2026. Underneath it, the model sees Philadelphia's deep-right passing attack rated at +0.35 EPA per play against Tennessee's defence, the biggest matchup edge on the board. The total sits at 39.5 with SportsBet, and the model's 42.0 projection produces only a 2.5-point edge on the over, which is a pass.

This early in the season the rating leans heavily on last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of both rosters and scaled by roster continuity, with the 2026 sample still just 1,830 plays. On last season's charting, Jalen Hurts averaged 0.328 EPA per dropback when clean but -0.663 under pressure. Nothing here clears the model's early-season thresholds, so both markets stay in the analysis-only bucket for now.

Why · PHI deep-right passing (+0.35 EPA/play vs TEN, TEN's weakest zone)

Situational

2025 season · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
PHI · 486 dropbacks
Jalen Hurts
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.33 (351 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.66 (135 snaps)
Pressure rate faced28%
Int-worthy rate2%
Drop rate (catchable)6%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
TEN defence: pressure 30% · blitz 23%
TEN · 592 dropbacks
Cam Ward
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.08 (407 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.80 (185 snaps)
Pressure rate faced31%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)7%
QB-fault sack rate4%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
PHI defence: pressure 33% · blitz 19%
PHI offence vs TEN coverage
ShellTEN usagePHI EPA/dbLeague
Cover 229% (173 snaps)-0.05 (109 snaps)0.00
Cover 326% (157 snaps)+0.23 (154 snaps)+0.06
Cover 119% (116 snaps)+0.11 (127 snaps)+0.06
Cover 49% (56 snaps)-0.09 (77 snaps)+0.07
TEN man coverage 27% · PHI vs man +0.12, vs zone +0.05
TEN offence vs PHI coverage
ShellPHI usageTEN EPA/dbLeague
Cover 135% (221 snaps)-0.30 (144 snaps)+0.06
Cover 322% (140 snaps)-0.20 (191 snaps)+0.06
Cover 218% (114 snaps)-0.02 (175 snaps)0.00
Cover 47% (43 snaps)-0.78 (45 snaps)+0.07
PHI man coverage 44% · TEN vs man -0.21, vs zone -0.19
PHI tendencies
Play action rate22% · +0.08 vs +0.07 EPA (128 snaps)
RPO rate6% (63 snaps)
Screen rate4% (25 snaps)
Personnel11 63%, 12 28%, 13 7%
Def pressure / blitz / man33% / 19% / 44%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.10 (296 snaps) · neutral -0.10 (126 snaps)
TEN tendencies
Play action rate19% · -0.04 vs -0.23 EPA (121 snaps)
RPO rate11% (110 snaps)
Screen rate11% (70 snaps)
Personnel11 73%, 12 24%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / 23% / 27%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.01 (201 snaps) · neutral -0.04 (149 snaps) · heavy +0.02 (44 snaps)

Model Form

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2025 season, weeks 6-17, V3 at best available line: 29-18, +17.8% ROI
Weeks 1 to 5 are published analysis-first. Only 1,830 plays of 2026 play-by-play exist so far (week 1), so ratings are still mostly last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with the 2026 sample phased in as it grows. The model alone cannot see coaching, roster or scheme changes - only the market anchor, roster continuity and the manual override tables capture those. In last season's backtest the same approach went 32-46 against the spread and 41-37 on totals over weeks 1 to 5; 53% on totals is break-even at -110. Only edges of 10 points or more are staked (Play) before week 6; a 7-10 point edge is analysis only (Lean), not a tip.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 17/09/2026V3.2