NFL 2026 · Week 2
Away
PIT
Pittsburgh Steelers
@
Home
NE
New England Patriots
Kick-off
Mon 21 Sep, 3:00am AEST
Sun 20 Sep, 1:00pm ET
Venue
Gillette Stadium
Spread
NE -5
Total
41.5
PIT ML
$3.05
NE ML
$1.43
AU consensus as of 17/09/2026, 12:15:05 pm

Power Comparison

PITRating -1.0
Off EPA/play
+0.037
Def EPA/play
+0.054
Exp points
15.9
Offence by zone
-.26
+.04
-.36
+.02
+.15
-.15
+.07
-.03
-.07
-.03
-.09
-.04
+.04
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.32
-.06
+.23
+.04
-.13
-.16
-.08
-.07
-.03
-.05
+.05
-.13
+.12
NERating +3.8
Off EPA/play
+0.097
Def EPA/play
+0.029
Exp points
24.0
Offence by zone
-.07
-.20
-.01
+.01
-.01
+.17
+.15
-.04
-.06
-.07
+.09
+.04
-.01
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
-.46
-.15
+.08
-.10
-.13
+.00
-.06
+.11
+.09
+.00
-.06
-.00
-.12
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

NE offence vs PIT
deep-left passing
+0.25 EPA/play
NE offence vs PIT
deep-right passing
+0.22 EPA/play
NE offence vs PIT
runs off right end
+0.14 EPA/play

Market

Spread (NE)
Open -5.5 Now -5·Move +0.5
AU best
NE -4.5 @ $1.85 Dabble AU
AU best (other side)
PIT +5.5 @ $1.90 SportsBet
Global best
NE -4.5 @ $1.91 ReBet
Total
Open 41.5 Now 41.5·Move 0.0
AU best over
Over 41.5 @ $1.91 TABtouch
AU best under
Under 42.0 @ $1.88 PlayUp
Global best over
Over 35.5 @ $1.37 Courtside
AU best PIT ML
$3.05 SportsBet
AU best NE ML
$1.43 Bet Right
11 AU books · 32 total · 6 snapshots

The Call

Edge noted / no bet: NE -4.5
Model NE +8.1 · total 40.0
Spread · Analysis
NE -4.5
$1.85 Dabble AU
Edge +3.6EDGE NOTED / NO BET
Total · Analysis
Under 42
$1.88 PlayUp
Edge +1.5PASS

The model has Patriots at 8.1 points, well clear of the market's -5.0 with the best line at -4.5 through Dabble AU at 1.85, giving an edge of 3.6 that falls under the 7-point Lean floor for weeks 1 to 5, so this is noted and nothing more. The early-season model sits at 1-0 against the spread this year, with last season's weeks 1 to 5 backtest going 32-46 against the spread as context for how this window behaves. On last season's charting, Aaron Rodgers averaged -0.71 EPA per dropback under pressure compared to Drake Maye's -0.243, and New England's deep-left passing shows a +0.25 EPA/play advantage against a Pittsburgh defence that ranks as their weakest zone there.

The rating still leans heavily on last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with only 1,830 plays of 2026 football in the sample so far, still mostly outweighed by last season and the market. That still leaves the gap short of the model's higher early-season bar, so it stays noted rather than acted on.

Why · NE deep-left passing (+0.25 EPA/play vs PIT, PIT's weakest zone)

Situational

2025 season · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
PIT · 526 dropbacks
Aaron Rodgers
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.23 (415 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.71 (111 snaps)
Pressure rate faced21%
Int-worthy rate2%
Drop rate (catchable)4%
QB-fault sack rate3%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
NE defence: pressure 27% · blitz 28%
NE · 540 dropbacks
Drake Maye
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.55 (368 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.24 (172 snaps)
Pressure rate faced32%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)4%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
PIT defence: pressure 30% · blitz 31%
PIT offence vs NE coverage
ShellNE usagePIT EPA/dbLeague
Cover 330% (176 snaps)-0.00 (149 snaps)+0.06
Cover 226% (155 snaps)+0.09 (152 snaps)0.00
Cover 126% (152 snaps)+0.04 (128 snaps)+0.06
Cover 49% (55 snaps)-0.02 (54 snaps)+0.07
NE man coverage 31% · PIT vs man +0.03, vs zone +0.04
NE offence vs PIT coverage
ShellPIT usageNE EPA/dbLeague
Cover 329% (200 snaps)+0.37 (169 snaps)+0.06
Cover 124% (165 snaps)+0.49 (147 snaps)+0.06
Cover 221% (144 snaps)+0.21 (161 snaps)0.00
Cover 49% (64 snaps)+0.31 (52 snaps)+0.07
2-Man7% (48 snaps)+0.07
PIT man coverage 35% · NE vs man +0.37, vs zone +0.28
PIT tendencies
Play action rate19% · -0.20 vs +0.09 EPA (115 snaps)
RPO rate9% (89 snaps)
Screen rate14% (81 snaps)
Personnel11 49%, 12 33%, 13 14%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / 31% / 35%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.01 (193 snaps) · neutral -0.09 (154 snaps) · heavy -0.04 (68 snaps)
NE tendencies
Play action rate24% · +0.34 vs +0.29 EPA (148 snaps)
RPO rate2% (15 snaps)
Screen rate4% (26 snaps)
Personnel11 52%, 12 22%, 21 19%, 22 6%
Def pressure / blitz / man27% / 28% / 31%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.06 (158 snaps) · neutral -0.01 (176 snaps) · heavy -0.14 (39 snaps)

Model Form

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2025 season, weeks 6-17, V3 at best available line: 29-18, +17.8% ROI
Weeks 1 to 5 are published analysis-first. Only 1,830 plays of 2026 play-by-play exist so far (week 1), so ratings are still mostly last season's numbers blended with the market's post-offseason view of each team and scaled by roster continuity, with the 2026 sample phased in as it grows. The model alone cannot see coaching, roster or scheme changes - only the market anchor, roster continuity and the manual override tables capture those. In last season's backtest the same approach went 32-46 against the spread and 41-37 on totals over weeks 1 to 5; 53% on totals is break-even at -110. Only edges of 10 points or more are staked (Play) before week 6; a 7-10 point edge is analysis only (Lean), not a tip.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 17/09/2026V3.2