NFL 2026 · Week 6
@
Home
IND
Indianapolis Colts
Kick-off
Mon 19 Oct, 4:00am AEDT
Sun 18 Oct, 1:00pm ET
AU consensus as of 15/10/2026, 11:39:22 am
Power Comparison
TENRating -11.9
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
INDRating -1.2
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.
Matchup Edges
IND offence vs TEN
short-middle passing
+0.48 EPA/play
TEN offence vs IND
runs off left end
+0.49 EPA/play
IND offence vs TEN
short-left passing
+0.12 EPA/play
Market
Spread (IND)
Open -7 → Now -7·Move 0.0
AU bestIND -6.5 @ $1.83 PointsBet (AU)
AU best (other side)TEN +7.5 @ $1.82 Dabble AU
Global bestIND -6.5 @ $1.83 FanDuel
Total
Open 44.0 → Now 44.0·Move 0.0
AU best overOver 43.5 @ $1.85 SportsBet
AU best underUnder 44.5 @ $1.90 PointsBet (AU)
Global best overOver 43.5 @ $1.87 FanDuel
AU best TEN ML
$3.70 SportsBet
AU best IND ML
$1.32 Dabble AU
10 AU books · 33 total · 7 snapshots
The Call
Play: IND -6.5
Model IND +14.1 · total 41.0Spread · Model recommendation
IND -6.5
$1.83 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +7.6PLAY
Total · Analysis
Under 44.5
$1.90 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +3.5LEAN
Indianapolis has the clearer route to sustained offense. Its model offensive EPA is 0.085 per play against Tennessee's -0.082, with short-middle passing the Colts' strongest highlighted matchup. That points toward Daniel Jones finding manageable completions rather than needing a series of difficult deep throws. Tennessee's defensive profile is also weaker, making early-down resistance important if the Titans are to keep the game close.
There are reasons not to assume a straightforward afternoon. Indianapolis is without Arden Key on injured reserve, reducing its pass-rush options against Cam Ward. Tennessee's best highlighted offensive opportunity is outside the left edge, but Tony Pollard missed Wednesday practice and Tyjae Spears was limited. Their availability could affect how well the Titans exploit that route. No numerical injury adjustment has been applied. IND -6.5 at PointsBet (AU), priced at 1.83, carries a 7.6-point model edge and qualifies as PLAY. Under 44.5 at the same bookmaker is a separate LEAN, not a formal model recommendation. The Colts selection is a recommendation, not an executed bet.
Why · IND short-middle passing (+0.48 EPA/play vs TEN, TEN's weakest zone)
Situational
2026 through week 5 (pressure, coverage and personnel: 2025 season) · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
TEN · 592 dropbacks
Cam Ward
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.08 (407 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.80 (185 snaps)
Pressure rate faced31%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)7%
QB-fault sack rate4%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
IND defence: pressure 29% · blitz —
IND · 409 dropbacks
Daniel Jones
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.29 (295 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.25 (114 snaps)
Pressure rate faced28%
Int-worthy rate4%
Drop rate (catchable)4%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
TEN defence: pressure 30% · blitz —
TEN offence vs IND coverage
| Shell | IND usage | TEN EPA/db | League |
|---|
| Cover 3 | 26% (182 snaps) | -0.20 (191 snaps) | +0.06 |
| Cover 2 | 24% (167 snaps) | -0.02 (175 snaps) | 0.00 |
| Cover 1 | 24% (166 snaps) | -0.30 (144 snaps) | +0.06 |
| Cover 4 | 8% (52 snaps) | -0.78 (45 snaps) | +0.07 |
| 2-Man | 7% (47 snaps) | — | +0.07 |
| Cover 0 | 6% (40 snaps) | — | +0.10 |
IND man coverage 37% · TEN vs man -0.21, vs zone -0.19
IND offence vs TEN coverage
| Shell | TEN usage | IND EPA/db | League |
|---|
| Cover 2 | 29% (173 snaps) | +0.13 (138 snaps) | 0.00 |
| Cover 3 | 26% (157 snaps) | +0.03 (158 snaps) | +0.06 |
| Cover 1 | 19% (116 snaps) | +0.13 (135 snaps) | +0.06 |
| Cover 4 | 9% (56 snaps) | +0.12 (64 snaps) | +0.07 |
TEN man coverage 27% · IND vs man +0.04, vs zone +0.09
TEN tendencies
Play action rate20% · — vs -0.13 EPA (36 snaps)
RPO rate6% (17 snaps)
Screen rate5% (8 snaps)
Personnel11 73%, 12 24%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / — / 27%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.19 (73 snaps) · neutral -0.04 (63 snaps)
IND tendencies
Play action rate30% · -0.09 vs -0.19 EPA (56 snaps)
RPO rate5% (15 snaps)
Screen rate8% (15 snaps)
Personnel11 64%, 12 26%, 13 9%
Def pressure / blitz / man29% / — / 37%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.07 (34 snaps) · neutral +0.17 (69 snaps)
Tracked Bets
2026 season graded betting log through Week 5 · last updated 15 Oct 2026, 11:55 am
Recorded bets only. Published model selections and historical backtests are tracked separately.
Team-history ratings use 9,277 eligible plays from 2026 through Week 5. Prior-season weight and numerical QB overrides are zero. Historical plays by other quarterbacks remain in each team's sample; the projection is not specific to the named starter and does not automatically account for new injuries. Injuries and situational splits provide context without additional numerical adjustments. Home-spread edges require 5 points for PLAY and 10 for STRONG; Over edges require 7 and 12. Away and Under directions remain analysis only. PLAY and STRONG labels are model recommendations, not confirmation that a bet was placed. Tracked Bets includes recorded bets only. Situational charting covers 2026 through Week 5; pressure, coverage and personnel cover 2025 through Week 18.
Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.
savvyplays.comPublished 15/10/2026V3.2