NFL 2026 · Week 6
Away
TEN
Tennessee Titans
@
Home
IND
Indianapolis Colts
Kick-off
Mon 19 Oct, 4:00am AEDT
Sun 18 Oct, 1:00pm ET
Venue
Lucas Oil Stadium
Spread
IND -7
Total
44.5
TEN ML
$3.70
IND ML
$1.32
AU consensus as of 15/10/2026, 11:39:22 am

Power Comparison

TENRating -11.9
Off EPA/play
-0.082
Def EPA/play
+0.135
Exp points
13.4
Offence by zone
+.04
+.05
-.43
-.13
-.75
-.07
+.25
-.03
-.42
+.01
-.05
+.02
+.02
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.17
+.04
+.28
+.20
+.32
-.08
-.10
+.06
+.01
-.08
-.06
+.14
-.06
INDRating -1.2
Off EPA/play
+0.085
Def EPA/play
+0.107
Exp points
27.5
Offence by zone
-.53
-.09
-.23
-.08
+.16
-.01
+.15
-.02
+.06
+.21
+.09
-.01
+.15
Defence by zone (EPA allowed)
+.15
+.02
+.04
+.10
-.11
-.15
+.24
+.24
+.14
+.15
-.02
-.08
-.13
Zone cells are EPA/play vs league mean, left to right in model order. Green = better for that team. Hover a cell for the zone name.

Matchup Edges

IND offence vs TEN
short-middle passing
+0.48 EPA/play
TEN offence vs IND
runs off left end
+0.49 EPA/play
IND offence vs TEN
short-left passing
+0.12 EPA/play

Market

Spread (IND)
Open -7 → Now -7·Move 0.0
AU best
IND -6.5 @ $1.83 PointsBet (AU)
AU best (other side)
TEN +7.5 @ $1.82 Dabble AU
Global best
IND -6.5 @ $1.83 FanDuel
Total
Open 44.0 → Now 44.0·Move 0.0
AU best over
Over 43.5 @ $1.85 SportsBet
AU best under
Under 44.5 @ $1.90 PointsBet (AU)
Global best over
Over 43.5 @ $1.87 FanDuel
AU best TEN ML
$3.70 SportsBet
AU best IND ML
$1.32 Dabble AU
10 AU books · 33 total · 7 snapshots

The Call

Play: IND -6.5
Model IND +14.1 · total 41.0
Spread · Model recommendation
IND -6.5
$1.83 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +7.6PLAY
Total · Analysis
Under 44.5
$1.90 PointsBet (AU)
Edge +3.5LEAN

Indianapolis has the clearer route to sustained offense. Its model offensive EPA is 0.085 per play against Tennessee's -0.082, with short-middle passing the Colts' strongest highlighted matchup. That points toward Daniel Jones finding manageable completions rather than needing a series of difficult deep throws. Tennessee's defensive profile is also weaker, making early-down resistance important if the Titans are to keep the game close.

There are reasons not to assume a straightforward afternoon. Indianapolis is without Arden Key on injured reserve, reducing its pass-rush options against Cam Ward. Tennessee's best highlighted offensive opportunity is outside the left edge, but Tony Pollard missed Wednesday practice and Tyjae Spears was limited. Their availability could affect how well the Titans exploit that route. No numerical injury adjustment has been applied. IND -6.5 at PointsBet (AU), priced at 1.83, carries a 7.6-point model edge and qualifies as PLAY. Under 44.5 at the same bookmaker is a separate LEAN, not a formal model recommendation. The Colts selection is a recommendation, not an executed bet.

Why · IND short-middle passing (+0.48 EPA/play vs TEN, TEN's weakest zone)

Situational

2026 through week 5 (pressure, coverage and personnel: 2025 season) · FTN charting via nflverse · min 40 snaps per cell (25 for box counts)
TEN · 592 dropbacks
Cam Ward
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.08 (407 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.80 (185 snaps)
Pressure rate faced31%
Int-worthy rate3%
Drop rate (catchable)7%
QB-fault sack rate4%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
IND defence: pressure 29% · blitz —
IND · 409 dropbacks
Daniel Jones
Clean pocket EPA/db+0.29 (295 snaps)
Under pressure EPA/db-0.25 (114 snaps)
Pressure rate faced28%
Int-worthy rate4%
Drop rate (catchable)4%
QB-fault sack rate2%
League: +0.26 clean · -0.46 pressured
TEN defence: pressure 30% · blitz —
TEN offence vs IND coverage
ShellIND usageTEN EPA/dbLeague
Cover 326% (182 snaps)-0.20 (191 snaps)+0.06
Cover 224% (167 snaps)-0.02 (175 snaps)0.00
Cover 124% (166 snaps)-0.30 (144 snaps)+0.06
Cover 48% (52 snaps)-0.78 (45 snaps)+0.07
2-Man7% (47 snaps)—+0.07
Cover 06% (40 snaps)—+0.10
IND man coverage 37% · TEN vs man -0.21, vs zone -0.19
IND offence vs TEN coverage
ShellTEN usageIND EPA/dbLeague
Cover 229% (173 snaps)+0.13 (138 snaps)0.00
Cover 326% (157 snaps)+0.03 (158 snaps)+0.06
Cover 119% (116 snaps)+0.13 (135 snaps)+0.06
Cover 49% (56 snaps)+0.12 (64 snaps)+0.07
TEN man coverage 27% · IND vs man +0.04, vs zone +0.09
TEN tendencies
Play action rate20% · — vs -0.13 EPA (36 snaps)
RPO rate6% (17 snaps)
Screen rate5% (8 snaps)
Personnel11 73%, 12 24%
Def pressure / blitz / man30% / — / 27%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight -0.19 (73 snaps) · neutral -0.04 (63 snaps)
IND tendencies
Play action rate30% · -0.09 vs -0.19 EPA (56 snaps)
RPO rate5% (15 snaps)
Screen rate8% (15 snaps)
Personnel11 64%, 12 26%, 13 9%
Def pressure / blitz / man29% / — / 37%
Box vs run, EPA allowedlight +0.07 (34 snaps) · neutral +0.17 (69 snaps)

Tracked Bets

Spread
1-0
Total
0-0
Units
+0.8
2026 season graded betting log through Week 5 · last updated 15 Oct 2026, 11:55 am
Recorded bets only. Published model selections and historical backtests are tracked separately.
Team-history ratings use 9,277 eligible plays from 2026 through Week 5. Prior-season weight and numerical QB overrides are zero. Historical plays by other quarterbacks remain in each team's sample; the projection is not specific to the named starter and does not automatically account for new injuries. Injuries and situational splits provide context without additional numerical adjustments. Home-spread edges require 5 points for PLAY and 10 for STRONG; Over edges require 7 and 12. Away and Under directions remain analysis only. PLAY and STRONG labels are model recommendations, not confirmation that a bet was placed. Tracked Bets includes recorded bets only. Situational charting covers 2026 through Week 5; pressure, coverage and personnel cover 2025 through Week 18.

Analysis only. Not financial advice. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online 1800 858 858. Read our responsible gambling policy.

savvyplays.comPublished 15/10/2026V3.2